[HCoop-Discuss] Idea to get regular users more involved with the nuts-and-bolts of HCOOP

[Lauren McNees]

I like the idea of having committees for any member to be on, but not
mandatory ones. With mandatory participation we will lose members. I
recommend creating an incentive, where members on a committee pay slightly
lower dues than non-participatory members.

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Shaun Empie <shaun at vpit.net> wrote:

> I really like this idea as well.  This is along the lines of what I was
> thinking in a previous email I sent.  I think every member needs to be
> involved in the running of the coop.  We could make committees like
> marketing, documentation, web server, email server, architecture, etc.
> Everyone would have to be on one.  The group would work together and
> decide on changes and the person leading the committee could either make
> the changes or pass them along to an admin.
>
> Having over 100 members rely on the work of a couple volunteers doesn't
> seem like a coop to me.
>
> -Shaun
>
> David Snider wrote:
> > I was thinking more along the lines of somebody figuring out how to get
> XYZ
> > Web Framework running within our setup, writing down the steps and then
> > handing it over to an Admins for implementation. Not to actually
> re-upload
> > the images. It's a bit of a timesaver in that we don't have to rely on
> > Admins to figure everything out for us.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HCoop-Discuss mailing list
> HCoop-Discuss at lists.hcoop.net
> https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.hcoop.net/pipermail/hcoop-discuss/attachments/20090601/4b27f371/attachment.htm