[HCoop-Discuss] other thing to note

[Shaun Kruger]

On 11/9/06, Nathan Kennedy <ntk at hcoop.net> wrote:
> Shaun Kruger wrote:
> > Right now hcoop is just self insuring the servers.  I would have to
> > agree that looking for a provider that doesn't require hcoop to insure
> > against damage to the facility would be a good idea.
> >
> > Does peer1 not insure their facility against loss?  Does peer1 have a
> > rider in their facility insurance policy that excludes damages by
> > customer equipment?
> >
> In case you missed this from the previous email, they don't enforce this
> term and none of their customers are actually buying this insurance.

No, I saw it.  I consider unenforced terms to be hazardous.  If
something goes wrong peer1 has a built in excuse and hcoop has a
liability.  Having a problem is not likely, but if it wasn't such a
big deal they would remove the clause.

Shaun

-- 
Visit my blog at http://hackerlog.blogspot.com
=====================================================
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would
be a merrier world.
                -- J.R.R. Tolkien