[Hcoop-discuss] Tax-exemption update

[Nathan Kennedy]

Nathan Kennedy wrote:
> Adam Chlipala wrote:
>   
>> Nathan Kennedy wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> 3. Details of our relationship with Xiolink and Interserver, as well as 
>>> any conflicts of interest.  I am asserting that no conflicts exist as 
>>> well as explaining our selection process.  However I *must* have from 
>>> Adam copies of our hosting agreement with Xiolink and Interserver, and 
>>> also if possible copies of our most recent monthly statements from each 
>>> of these.
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> I've put up some preliminary information at
>>     http://www.schizomaniac.net/irs/
>> excluding scanned copies of things with physical signatures.
>>
>> I will scan the agreements and get them to you soon.  The Xiolink 
>> agreement has a space for a Xiolink representative's signature, but I 
>> don't think they ever mailed me back a version with that signature 
>> filled in.  Do you think we should just submit the version without it 
>> and wait for possible complaints (probably including a note explaining 
>> the reason)?
>>   
>>     
> I really don't think that's an issue.  If we can get scans of a physical 
> signed copy that's best, just in terms of the best thing we have to 
> offer.  But a contract doesn't have to be signed by both parties to be 
> enforceable.  It doesn't even have be signed excepted where the statute 
> of frauds applies (which it does not in this case since our leases are 
> month-to-month) and even then it only needs to be signed by the party to 
> be charged.
Assuming the documents you were going to scan are merely signed versions 
of the ones already up on the website, I don't actually think you need 
to bother getting them scanned.

-ntk