[HCoop-Discuss] Apache choice?

[Michael Olson]

leitgebj at hcoop.net writes:

> Maybe in the migration it wouldn't be a bad idea to try using
> lighthttpd or something else (I've heard some good things about
> lighthttpd), but I don't have any first-hand experience with servers
> besides apache personally and for that reason can't comment any
> further.

I used to have lighttpd running on my work machine, but it was
incapable of serving files for a Red Hat Enterprise Linux installation
over the network -- I would continually be getting timeouts and 404s.
Switching back to apache2 made the problems go away.

I would definitely oppose making lighttpd the default http server for
hcoop.

-- 
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
  /` |\ | | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC
 |_] | \| |_| Reclaim your digital rights by eliminating DRM.
      See http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm for details.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.hcoop.net/pipermail/hcoop-discuss/attachments/20061214/04654175/attachment.pgp