[HCoop-Discuss] Backups: rsync vs. Amazon Glacier

Steve Killen steven.f.killen at gmail.com
Mon Sep 3 14:49:21 EDT 2012


On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Adam Chlipala <adam at chlipala.net> wrote:

> **
> On 09/03/2012 12:23 PM, Steve Killen wrote:
>
> So we currently do backups with rsync.net for ~$60/mo. I just ran across
> Amazon Glacier:
>
> http://aws.amazon.com/glacier/
>
> It's $0.01/GB a month.
>
> I'm just spitballing to get the conversation started, but off the cuff it
> seems worth looking into to reduce our backup costs--how much data are we
> maintaining with rsync?
>
>
> I don't even know if a working, reasonable back-up regime is in place at
> this point.  It wouldn't surprise me if that slipped by the wayside during
> various upgrades.
>
> A regular process for testing the integrity of back-up data would be
> great; I don't think we ever had one.
>
>
FWIW, I've seen Clinton restore data for a few users over the last several
months, so that's at least a spot-check. But I agree, an actual,
thoroughgoing backup effectiveness policy is a better idea than just hoping
it keeps working. :)

-- 
Steven F. Killen <steven.f.killen at gmail.com>
| elvestinkle @ twitter
| pursuing.calefaction.org

Etsi provectus in sententiis sis
Esse parvulus in spiritus debes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.hcoop.net/pipermail/hcoop-discuss/attachments/20120903/72d881ce/attachment.htm 


More information about the HCoop-Discuss mailing list