[HCoop-Discuss] Mailing list subscription policies
John T. Settino
john at johnsettino.com
Thu Nov 12 11:05:10 EST 2009
Hi folks,
I just thought I'd pop in here and throw in my $.02.
How about DomTool integration to see if we host the domain the person
wishes to subscribe with? e.g., people could subscribe with addresses they
host at hcoop, and then we wouldn't have to explicitly allow them to post
to the lists from those addresses (one step less for list mods).
I don't use my @hcoop.net email for anything as an address, but the email
box it points to is the one I use every day... I just have hcoop hosted
domains put email there. The from: address on my emails is an hcoop-hosted
address, but I would not be able to post to any lists without first being
whitelisted.
Adam, is this possible or would it be hacking into our mailing list
software? Your destroy script could then be extended to unsubscribe
addresses associated with DomTool domains that the account you're
destroying had permissions to manage.
As for outsiders (non-HCOOPers), I think we should continue keeping the
archives open (so they can read what everyone is saying), not allow them
to subscribe, but allow them to post only to the -discuss list (via
listmod approval) if what they have to say is relevant.
- John
> Richard Darst wrote:
>> Hello -discuss,
>>
>> At first, I wasn't going to comment since I figured it wouldn't come
>> to anything, but this morning I was thinking that I should say
>> something, at least to promote the spirit I'd rather hcoop be...
>>
>> (Moving to -discuss since this is more of a philosophical thing)
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 02:25:24PM -0400, Adam Chlipala wrote:
>>
>>
>>> - Our current policy is not to allow subscriptions from addresses that
>>> aren't in the form USER at hcoop.net. Members should subscribe only
>>> through the portal, and you should reject direct subscription requests
>>> of any kind. Sending from non-HCoop addresses is supported through
>>> whitelisting by moderators, and receipt of list mail at arbitrary
>>> addresses is supported by forwarding from HCoop accounts. (The policy
>>> is open to discussion, but I still think it's the right way to do
>>> things.)
>>>
>>
>> I strongly feel that this isn't the right default policy...
>>
>> As an open, community, cooperative project, I think defaults should be
>> open. (of course, there could be specific exceptions, like the
>> sysadmin list what was already discussed at some point in the past.)
>> I think the question should be "why not" rather than "why".
>>
>
> One non-trivial administrative issue is removing people from lists
> automatically when they leave the co-op, either explicitly or by
> ignoring us and refusing to pay. Our current destroy-user script just
> unsubscribes that user's @hcoop.net address from all lists. It would be
> a pain to figure out which subscriptions belong to that user.
>
> In general, I'm willing to go along with whatever policy folks want, as
> long as it doesn't make more work for me. I'm currently the sole person
> creating and destroying accounts, so the subject of this thread does
> affect me.
>
> _______________________________________________
> HCoop-Discuss mailing list
> HCoop-Discuss at lists.hcoop.net
> https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
>
>
--
John T. Settino
Web Developer / Technologist for Hire
http://www.johnsettino.com/
* Please consider the environment before printing this email. :DGC
More information about the HCoop-Discuss
mailing list