[HCoop-Discuss] Dedicated servers?

[Adam Chlipala]

Adam Megacz wrote:
> Adam Chlipala <adamc at hcoop.net> writes:
>   
>>> That server, for example, has a RSA (Remote Admin card, a bit
>>> of a name clash, ain't it?) that supports ssh and console access
>>> (no need for a separate KVM box)
>>>       
>> It's probably more economical to have a separate KVM if you have more 
>> than two servers, right?  IP address costs alone could start to add up.
>>     
>
> IBM's servers are very cool -- their RSA card includes "KVM-over-IP"
> functionality.  So you don't need a separate KVM.  Most service
> processors do not include this feature.
>   

What I'm saying is that, with several servers, even if they could work 
without a separate KVM, I would guess that it makes sense to use one 
anyway, to avoid needing a separate IP address for each card.  Is that 
wrong?