[HCoop-Discuss] Procmail log location on new system

[Michael Olson]

Adam Megacz <megacz at hcoop.net> writes:

> Michael Olson <mwolson at hcoop.net> writes:
>> The rationale for this is to make the Procmail directions on the wiki
>> easier to follow, with less possibility for people choosing a
>> location that can't be written to by procmail.  We've currently got
>> at least one person writing to such a file, according to deleuze's
>> syslog.  This would also enforce a good trend for storing log
>> messages under the standard directory ~/logs.
>
> I like this idea, but could we make it ~/.logs?  IMHO the non-dotfile
> namespace is strictly for users and shouldn't be imposed on
> them... (one of my major pet peeves with MacOS).

Would apache logs be stored there, too?  If so, I'm fine with ~/.logs.

-- 
       Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652     |
 http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net  |  /` |\ | | |
            Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop    | |_] | \| |_|
Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.hcoop.net/pipermail/hcoop-discuss/attachments/20071006/8a331aca/attachment.pgp