[Hcoop-discuss] hcoop.net or hosting.coop? Time for a new domain name?

[ntk at hcoop.net]

h.coop is not valid, because .coop rules (which are a lot stricter than
.com) forbid domain names less than three characters long.

hcoop.coop is redundant, if we were getting a .coop name hosting.coop
would make much more sense & I think it's available.  naturally we will
always want to hold on to hcoop.net.

.coop starts at $99 a year.  I don't think we can justify another $99/year
cost yet for something that frivolous.  of course we might regret if
someone later takes hosting.coop, but I'm sure we could find another
alternative.  in any event the strict rules requiring .coop domains to be
co-ops or related means it is quite sparseley populated.

-ntk

> I'm actually fine with hcoop.net, but that's me.
>
> Justin Hart
>
> On 2/2/06, Karl Chen <quarl at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hcoop.coop sounds redundant.  Is H.coop available? :)
>>
>> >>>>> On 2006-02-02 13:32 PST, Justin S Leitgeb writes:
>>
>>     Justin> Is there any interest in becoming hosting.coop (or
>>     Justin> another .coop name that members come up with) among
>>     Justin> current members?  Are there any really compelling
>>     Justin> reasons not to get a cooperative domain name, given
>>     Justin> our current size and expected growth?
>>
>> --
>> Karl 2006-02-02 15:41
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hcoop-discuss mailing list
>> Hcoop-discuss at hcoop.net
>> http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
>>
>
>
> --
> Justin W. Hart
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hcoop-discuss mailing list
> Hcoop-discuss at hcoop.net
> http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
>