<div>I posted this table before:</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Current Linode<br>Transfer: 1TB 1.6TB<br>Disk: ? 128GB ($2/month for each additional GB)<br>Memory: 5GB 2.8GB</div>
<div>CPU: Opteron 1.6GHz ? (>= 1/5th of some server-class machine)<br>Cost/month: ? $160<br></div>
<div>Care to update it? If most people agreed that VPS would cost more, it'd be nice if they shared their estimates with the rest of us. </div>
<div> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Michael Potter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mpotter@hcoop.net">mpotter@hcoop.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im">Daniel Margolis wrote:<br>> Some animals are more equal than others, Michael. Anyway, I seem to<br>> recall that there were elections for the board. I know I didn't vote<br>> in them, but I assume you did.<br>
><br>> On technical grounds, everyone who's commented seems to agree that a<br>> VPS would save us money. I've yet to see any claims to the contrary,<br>> but maybe I missed them in this huge-ass thread. I'm not personally<br>
> interested in the ideological aspects, but if everyone else agrees<br>> that we should only buy our bandwidth, hosting, and hardware from<br>> coops, then that's fine with me, as long as Hcoop remains a worthwhile<br>
> value proposition for my uses. I'm here solely because it's the<br>> cheapest way for me to get what I want.<br>><br><br></div>Actually I think most agreed that it would probably cost more but would<br>
solve certain logistical problems.<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>HCoop-Discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:HCoop-Discuss@lists.hcoop.net">HCoop-Discuss@lists.hcoop.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>