<div dir="ltr">Of course. But making people rearrange their home directories to maintain any privacy is kind of silly. <br><br>It's not the end of the world, but saying "AFS provides users with the most choice" is wrong. My choice would be to have my home directory be private (ideally, from authenticed users as well).<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Adam Chlipala <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:adamc@hcoop.net">adamc@hcoop.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Daniel Margolis wrote:<br>
> But again, this doesn't prevent the home directory from being world<br>
> executable/"listable". Perhaps I'm "really paranoid," but for me, this<br>
> is an unacceptable arrangement.<br>
<br>
</div>You can always create a subdirectory "private" where system:anyuser has<br>
no permissions and then pretend that "private" is your home directory.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
HCoop-Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:HCoop-Discuss@lists.hcoop.net">HCoop-Discuss@lists.hcoop.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>