<div>Hi Doc -</div>
<div>Earlier today, Adam said on this list that ns3 is not available for customer use, and we all should use only ns1. Hence, my email that you replied to. So who is correct? Are the admins talking to eachother?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Jeff<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 19, 2007 1:54 PM, docelic <<a href="mailto:docelic@mire.hcoop.net">docelic@mire.hcoop.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br> </div>Hi,<br><br>We've always provided two DNS servers minimum.<br>I was not the main person behind it and so I couldn't give<br>the big picture, but the plan was to have ns1 and ns3 as<br>
pointers to the new infrastructure. (ns1 = deleuze, ns3 = mire).<br><br>Then, later, when Fyodor (old server) is decomissioned, we would<br>also point ns2 to mire. Ns3 would be left pointing at Mire not<br>to break configs for people who used that as their name server.
<br>Eventually if we got a third one, ns3 could be redirected there.<br><br>So if I'm still up to date with information, users on the new<br>infrastructure should use ns1 and ns3, and if ns3 isn't working,<br>it's a bug.
<br><br>-doc<br><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Jeff Basham<br><a href="mailto:jeff@jeffbasham.com">jeff@jeffbasham.com</a><br><a href="http://www.jeffbasham.com">http://www.jeffbasham.com</a> </blockquote></div>